realitybasedcommunity
first amendment, intellectual property, media law, scientology, family law. about scott pilutik
 
Possible Scientology v. Gawker Empire copyright action » 
main
  « God's Constitution
most recent twitter
It's not as if #Palin has been governing anyway--she's been on the guest speaker circuit since Nov
follow me on twitter
del.icio.us bookmarks
follow me on del.icio.us
friend feed
  • Jun 29th 2009, 11:48AM
    Best Friends http://ff.im/-4A199
  • Jun 23rd 2009, 11:03PM
    Kush Support - A Natural Rest for the Breast http://ff.im/-4mdBa
  • Jun 17th 2009, 2:36AM
    Mad Men: Season 2: Disc 2 http://ff.im/-44DHu
  • Jun 17th 2009, 2:36AM
    Mad Men: Season 2: Disc 4 http://ff.im/-44DHv
  • Jun 17th 2009, 2:36AM
    Mad Men: Season 2: Disc 1 http://ff.im/-44DHw
  • Jun 17th 2009, 2:36AM
    Mad Men: Season 2: Disc 3 http://ff.im/-44DHx
  • May 23rd 2009, 12:49PM
    Bonnie Prince Billy - Agnes queen of sorrow http://ff.im/-3beUK
  • May 23rd 2009, 12:49PM
    Capital Keeps Falling on My Head - Sam Zell Christmas Card http://ff.im/-3beUL
  • follow me on friendfeed
    recent posts
     Wrongful Death Suit Filed Against Scientology by the Estate of Kyle Brennan
     Diskeeper responds to Godelman's opposition to motion to strike
     Claire Headley v. CSI, RTC
     Veiled legal threats from Diskeeper
     Godelman and Le Shay Respond to Diskeeper’s Motion to Strike
     Marc Headley v. Church of Scientology International
     Scientology's new anti-picketing ordinance in Riverside County
     Former CIO sues Diskeeper claims he was fired for not participating in Scientology training
     Sklar II Disappoints
     Legislative Prayer, Charles Lynch, and Civil Religion
    January 17, 2008  
    thoughts on the tom cruise video

    I don't talk about it much here but I've long been vocally critical of the Church of Scientology; indeed, long enough to get onto their shitlist. I worked for the lawyer representing the estate of Lisa McPherson in that case and have authored and co-authored a few websites dedicated to various Scientology related topics. I've met other critics even and consider more than a few close friends. And since everyone on the interwebs is wondering what the hell they're looking at, I figure I'll weigh in.

    First a point on Tom Cruise's behavior. The interview seems like it's been cut to make him seem crazier but it's actually been cut by people who are deeply empathetic toward what he's saying. They don't see his behavior as odd because Scientologists don't view Cruise's rabid intensity as creepy, but rather see him as projecting Tone 40, that is, "a positive postulate with no counter-thought--expected, anticipated or anything else; that is, total control." Watch the video again--does this look like a man who tolerates much less even entertains counter-thoughts? Not Tom Cruise.

    A few points on the Scientologese used by Cruise are also in order.

    "SPs" are Suppressive Persons--innate enemies of Scientology (comprising some 2.5% of the population according to L Ron Hubbard). The organization owes its deep paranoia to Hubbard, who saw enemies everywhere.

    "PTS" stands for "Potential Trouble Source," which is similar to an SP. The term most often comes up in relation to a skeptical family member who has the gall to ask questions like: "Your jobless ass has maxed out how many credit cards so you could become 'clear'? WTF?" Scientologists are encouraged, for obvious reasons, to either "handle" or disconnect from potential trouble spots.

    "Keep Scientology Working," or "KSW" is probably the single most important precept in all of Scientology and also its scariest. KSW operates as a sort of parental or umbrella concept to govern all the other ideas that comprise Scientology, sort of like the first rule in Fight Club (i.e., Do Not Talk About Fight Club). KSW establishes the supremacy of Scientology's "technology" and mandates that Scientologists rabidly guard it against any alteration or attack.

    Tomorrow or the next day I'll discuss the legal issues surrounding the publishing of the video, Ava Paquette's C&D sent to Gawker, Gawker's response, and postulate (heh) the likelihood of particular outcomes. I'll also discuss the irony that Scientology most likely did not obtain a license to use Lalo Schifrin's Mission Impossible Theme as backing music to the Tom Cruise interview.


    posted by scott pilutik @ 12:52 AM

    permalink  ||  digg  |  del.icio.us  |  reddit

    contact | site powered by movabletype | Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License