|
||||
|
|
|
||
 |
 |
|
|
|
 realitybasedcommunity.net - writings on establishment clause, free exercise, free speech, free press, copyright, trademark, right of publicity, media law, defamation, new media law. about scott pilutik. The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.'' - Ron Suskind, Without a Doubt, NY Times, October 17, 2004
archives
June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | |
|
|
|
Archives for October 2007 October 24, 2007 fantasy names and statistics are free
I forget whether I commented on this case here before but I'm pleased at its end. A while back MLB sued the CBC fantasy sports empire over the right to use the baseball players' names, claiming that its use was violation of the players' right of publicity. The Eighth Circuit disagreed (pdf), affirming a lower court's decision 2-1, saying that "It would be strange law that a person would not have a First Amendment right to use information that is available to everyone." MLB sought to make a distinction between use of the names and statistics by the press and by a commercial entity (CBC). Complicating the constitutional issue somewhat were a series of contracts presuming that the players' names were indeed valuable: The MLBPA licensed to MLB the rights to their names for $50m and MLB in turn licensed to various entities for $2m a pop. The sole dissenting judge agreed with the majority's free speech rationale, but argued that it should be held to the terms of its agreement with MLB, since the status of those rights were uncertain at the time it entered into the agreement. While the opinion's reach is limited to the Eighth Circuit, it seems unlikely that MLB--or any other pro sports league (most who were amici in the MLB case)--will litigate this issue elsewhere, having been shut down on the main issue by four judges total. Then again, a whole lot of contracts for a whole lot of money just became moot, so who knows what'll happen--perhaps litigation to hash out the preexisting contracts. But the upshot is a breath of fresh air--the names and statistics produced by professional sports figures can no longer be owned and licensed because they belong to everyone. ars technica story with deeper background on the case here. posted by scott pilutik at October 24, 2007 09:45 AM
digg |
del.icio.us |
reddit |
|
|
contact | site powered by movabletype Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License |