logo

«  August 2007
main
October 2007  »

realitybasedcommunity.net - writings on establishment clause, free exercise, free speech, free press, copyright, trademark, right of publicity, media law, defamation, new media law. about scott pilutik.


As long as a religion rests upon those sentiments which are the consolation of all affliction, it may attract the affections of mankind. But if it be mixed up with the bitter passions of the world, it may be constrained to defend allies whom its interests, and not the principle of love, have given to it. - Alexis De Tocqueville

Archives for September 2007

September 16, 2007

separation of church and stadium

Filip Bondy, longtime NY Daily News columnist wrote a brave column condemning the persistent stadium (and arena) practice of singing God Bless America.

I'm at Shea Stadium today for a Met game, which has at least one advantage over a Yankee game: "God Bless America" won't be eating up time during the seventh-inning stretch.

I hate that song, and I really don't see why I can't feel free to say that. First of all, it is Irving Berlin's most simplistic and banal melody -- other than the intricate intro that is usually skipped. And then there are the many reasons it makes me uncomfortable watching an entire stadium of fellow countrymen sing about how God is, or ought to be, on their side.
I commented on the Daily News site, but I'll post here since I rambled on for a bit:

Thanks for this Filip -- it's an unpopular sentiment and will likely pre-qualify you for a stream of hate mail, and I applaud the bravery for speaking up. I've always felt uncomfortable listening to God Bless America being sung in arenas and stadiums too. But as Ed rightly points out, there's no actual church-state issue here because the state isn't present.

Sporting events are regularly attended by hundreds of thousands of people each day and night, and these events represent opportunities for subtle group indoctrination. When else are you asked to stand and sign along with 20 to 50 thousand others? Over time, repetition gels into belief. Whether Steinnbrenner is the State or not shouldn't matter--the issue is cultural sensitivity. Religion is an intensely private liberty to which everyone has a right, including Buddhists, Hindus, and other non-monotheistic religions, along with the 'non-religious' -- agnostics and atheists. Having God Bless America sung night after night sends a message to these minority groups that they don't belong, and should be considered outsiders.

As for the sentiment itself, I agree with Fliip--promoting the idea that the creator of the universe somehow plays favorites based on man-made geographically drawn borders is profoundly narcissistic (after all, if he's blessing one nation, who is he/she not blessing?). It's the global parallel to the nearly identical conceit implied when winning players 'Thank God' for their victory.

If you truly believe that God likes your team or your country better, take a look at the world, and tell me why God is concerning himself with the Red Sox Yankees series while millions starve to death or live each day under oppressive, abusive regimes. And if your answer is that God has appointed America to fix these problems, take a closer look ... because we're not.

posted by scott pilutik at September 16, 2007 11:16 AM

digg  |  del.icio.us  |  reddit
permalink



contact  |  site powered by movabletype
Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License