|
||||
|
|
|
||
 |
 |
|
|
|
 realitybasedcommunity.net - writings on establishment clause, free exercise, free speech, free press, copyright, trademark, right of publicity, media law, defamation, new media law. about scott pilutik. The preservation of a free Government requires not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. - James Madison
archives
June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | |
|
|
|
Archives for August 2006 August 25, 2006 Religious Correctness
The title of Russell Shaw's piece at Huffington Post is unambiguously titled: "Tom Cruise's Firing: Anti-Scientology Religious Bigotry". I tried to post a comment there, but the login server appears to be having difficulties, so I'll rant, briefly, here instead. The author and a few commenters rely on the mistaken notion that the defining aspect of a cult is 'belief', when in reality, it is the degree of *control* exerted over adherents that separates a religion from a cult. In order to establish the amount of control necessary to create a fanatical base, cults rely on a greater degree of 'us v. them' rhetoric, in order to separate its target from the mainstream, and more closely bind it to its tendered replacement. Scientology exhibits this sort of control in a number of ways: by the fact that it routinely requires its members to disconnect from their families (those families that ask uncomfortable questions about where all that money disappeared to); adheres to a "greater good for Scientology" mentality, by which nearly any action can be justified, so long as its goal is to "Keep Scientology Working," or "KSW" in Scientology's dense, insular, extensive lexicon; maintains something called the "Rehabilitation Project Force" ("RPF"), which is essentially a labor camp for members who are being punished for violations, which can include "bad thoughts about Scientology" or its current leader. Shaw's platitudinous argument that criticism of Tom Cruise is bigotry has a simplistic appeal, but cannot withstand scrutiny. What's interesting about this argument is its similarity to arguments raised by Evangelical Christians that the prohibition on teaching creationism in science class is some form of religious persecution. It's part of a larger "Religious Correctness" movement that is slowly becoming visible, the rules of which require that religions be shielded from criticism by charges of "Bigotry!" What's especially ironic about this, of course, is that many religious beliefs intrinsically sanction bigotry and discrimination. And the same people who now cry "bigot!" at every slight are the same people who were only snarling about "Political Correctness" only a few years ago. posted by scott pilutik at August 25, 2006 03:08 PM
digg |
del.icio.us |
reddit August 21, 2006 liberty
 We were walking back to Manhattan over the Brooklyn Bridge, and the sky could not have been more ominous. There's a metaphor in this picture, but it's so heavyhanded that I"d be embarrassed to name it even. posted by scott pilutik at August 21, 2006 01:34 PM
digg |
del.icio.us |
reddit |
|
|
contact | site powered by movabletype Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License |