logo


realitybasedcommunity.net - writings on establishment clause, free exercise, free speech, free press, copyright, trademark, right of publicity, media law, defamation, new media law. about scott pilutik.


As long as a religion rests upon those sentiments which are the consolation of all affliction, it may attract the affections of mankind. But if it be mixed up with the bitter passions of the world, it may be constrained to defend allies whom its interests, and not the principle of love, have given to it. - Alexis De Tocqueville

July 08, 2005

7/7

Usually I just wait around until Wolcott gets disgusted enough with Podhoretz to write about him (which is every few days lately), but since neither Wolcott nor anyone else has caught this just yet, I'll point out that in today's NY Post, The Pod wastes no time in commodifying the London disaster as "7/7". You won't see it by clicking that link however, as it only appears as a subtitle in the hard copy: "What 7/7 Means for NYC". Chris Bowers rounds up the Fox coverage and finds about what you'd expect - gleeful yammering boobs, quoted as saying that the attacks were "a good thing," "work[] to our advantage," a "treat," and a "good time to buy."

It's nostolgia all over again for the Neo-cons, as they'll argue numerous variations of "I told you so," but at the end of the day, our soldiers are in Iraq baptizing more terrorists, while this attack was domestic. Nothing in Iraq connects to London but we'll surely see enough rhetorical gymnastics over the next few weeks to make it so. The bottom line is that if someone wants to build and explode a bomb in a major city, not much is going to stop them. Pretending that the entire problem can be met at its physical source is bullshit.

posted by scott pilutik at July 8, 2005 12:12 PM

digg  |  del.icio.us  |  reddit
permalink

contact  |  site powered by movabletype
Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License