January 23, 2005
NY Times editorial rips evolution foes
The New York Times makes many good points today in an editorial titled "The Crafty Attacks on Evolution". Their layman interpretation of the Cobb County sticker is especially astute (and not all that different a conclusion than Judge Cooper's):
Although the board clearly thought this was a reasonable compromise, and many readers might think it unexceptional, it is actually an insidious effort to undermine the science curriculum. The first sentence sounds like a warning to parents that the film they are about to watch with their children contains pornography. Evolution is so awful that the reader must be warned that it is discussed inside the textbook. The second sentence makes it sound as though evolution is little more than a hunch, the popular understanding of the word "theory," whereas theories in science are carefully constructed frameworks for understanding a vast array of facts. The National Academy of Sciences, the nation's most prestigious scientific organization, has declared evolution "one of the strongest and most useful scientific theories we have" and says it is supported by an overwhelming scientific consensus.The third sentence, urging that evolution be studied carefully and critically, seems like a fine idea. The only problem is, it singles out evolution as the only subject so shaky it needs critical judgment. Every subject in the curriculum should be studied carefully and critically. Indeed, the interpretations taught in history, economics, sociology, political science, literature and other fields of study are far less grounded in fact and professional consensus than is evolutionary biology.
posted by scott pilutik at January 23, 2005 07:14 PM
digg |
del.icio.us |
reddit
permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://realitybasedcommunity.net/mt-tb.cgi/40