logo

Herbert - it's the stupidity stupid »
main
« Inherit the Warning Stickers?

realitybasedcommunity.net - writings on establishment clause, free exercise, free speech, free press, copyright, trademark, right of publicity, media law, defamation, new media law. about scott pilutik.

As long as a religion rests upon those sentiments which are the consolation of all affliction, it may attract the affections of mankind. But if it be mixed up with the bitter passions of the world, it may be constrained to defend allies whom its interests, and not the principle of love, have given to it. - Alexis De Tocqueville
archives
June 2008 |  May 2008 |  April 2008 |  March 2008 |  February 2008 |  January 2008 |  December 2007 |  October 2007 |  September 2007 |  August 2007 |  July 2007 |  June 2007 |  April 2007 |  March 2007 |  February 2007 |  December 2006 |  November 2006 |  September 2006 |  August 2006 |  July 2006 |  June 2006 |  May 2006 |  January 2006 |  December 2005 |  November 2005 |  October 2005 |  September 2005 |  August 2005 |  July 2005 |  June 2005 |  May 2005 |  April 2005 |  March 2005 |  February 2005 |  January 2005 |  December 2004 |  November 2004 |  October 2004 | 

November 08, 2004

Kinsley

Michael Kinsley gets to the heart of the matter in asking whose values actually impose on the others':

I mean, look at it this way. (If you don't mind, that is.) It's true that people on my side of the divide want to live in a society where women are free to choose and where gay relationships have civil equality with straight ones. And you want to live in a society where the opposite is true. These are some of those conflicting values everyone is talking about. But at least my values — as deplorable as I'm sure they are — don't involve any direct imposition on you. We don't want to force you to have an abortion or to marry someone of the same sex, whereas you do want to close out those possibilities for us. Which is more arrogant?

We on my side of the great divide don't, for the most part, believe that our values are direct orders from God. We don't claim that they are immutable and beyond argument. We are, if anything, crippled by reason and open-mindedness, by a desire to persuade rather than insist. Which philosophy is more elitist? Which is more contemptuous of people who disagree?

posted by scott pilutik at November 8, 2004 06:44 PM

digg  |  del.icio.us  |  reddit
permalink

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://realitybasedcommunity.net/mt-tb.cgi/14
contact  |  site powered by movabletype
Site content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License